"In June, the U.S. Copyright Office announced a widely criticized proposal to create a licensing system to clear these rights, with the goal of facilitating full-text access to copyrighted works for nonprofit and educational uses. The Copyright Office is currently soliciting comments on its proposal. It’s a good thing that they’re soliciting comments: the proposal the Copyright Office came up with is an unworkable mess, filled with restrictions and gaps in coverage. It doesn’t solve the orphan works problem -- instead, it makes the problem worse, and adds a tax on cash-strapped, desperate libraries to the mix. The Copyright Office needs to hear why its proposal is a bad idea. Comments are due to the Office by October 9, 2015. I submitted mine (below). You can submit yours online."
Issues and developments related to Intellectual Property (e.g. Copyright, Fair Use, Patents, Trademarks, Trade Secrets) and Open Movements (e.g. Open Access, Open Data, Open Educational Resources (OER)), examined in the "Intellectual Property and Open Movements" and "Ethics of Data, Information, and Emerging Technologies" graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. -- Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label Maria A. Pallante U.S. Register of Copyright. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maria A. Pallante U.S. Register of Copyright. Show all posts
Monday, September 14, 2015
Copyright Office seeks your comments on its crazy, broken plan to deal with orphan works; BoingBoing.net, 9/14/15
Cory Doctorow, BoingBoing.net; Copyright Office seeks your comments on its crazy, broken plan to deal with orphan works:
Friday, August 30, 2013
Twenty-Sixth Horace S. Manges Lecture, Columbia University Law School, 3/4/13
Maria A. Pallante, U.S. Register of Copyrights; The Next Great Copyright Act:
"Tonight my topic is the next great copyright act, but before I speak about the
future, I would like to talk a little about the past, including the role of the Copyright
Office in past revision activities. In my remarks, I will address the need for
comprehensive review and revision of U.S. copyright law, identify the most
significant issues, and suggest a framework by which Congress should weigh the
public interest, which includes the interests of authors. I will also address the
necessary evolution of the Copyright Office itself."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)