Showing posts with label ebook piracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ebook piracy. Show all posts

Saturday, April 23, 2011

There's a better way to beat the ebook pirates; Observer via Guardian, 4/24/11

Russell Davies, Observer via Guardian; There's a better way to beat the ebook pirates:

"Apparently shocked by the number of pirated ebooks available, the publishers' trade body has decided to create a "copyright infringement portal" where publishers can report any infringing works they find so take-down notices can be issued...

They seem not to have realised that the only way to compete with pirates is to offer a better product and better service; a better combination of price, convenience and availability."

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Pirates find easy new pickings in open waters of e-book publishing; London Times, 11/21/09

Mike Harvey, London Times; Pirates find easy new pickings in open waters of e-book publishing:

"Digital pirates, who for years have tormented the music and film industries, have found a new source of plunder in e-book publishing.

With the words “dan brown lost symbol torrent” and a few clicks, anyone can download the American author’s latest bestseller free via any of hundreds of web links.

This Christmas, e-book reading devices such as Amazon’s Kindle and Sony’s Reader will be among the most popular gadgets. But there are fears that as consumers get used to reading digital books they will look for a free download rather than pay.

In the US, where the Kindle has been available for two years, digital book piracy is booming. The web has enabled thousands of sites to distribute pirated book content free. American publishers are estimated to have lost more than $600 million (£363 million) last year to piracy...

British publishers are taking action to stop the pirates. The Publishers Association has released a web tool that allows publishers to log the details of an infringement of copyright. It then sends a demand to the offending website for the link to be removed. The portal has been alerted to more than 4,000 cases of online piracy by more than 40 publishers and has succeeded in taking down 2,638 illegal copies of books.

Alicia Wise, digital consultant to the association, said: “There are a lot of holes in the dyke. We are surprised by the scale and spectrum of authors that are being pirated. We need to get to grips quickly with practical ways of tackling copyright infringement.”

Book publishers are determined to prevent their business from being undermined in the same way as the music and film industries have. The relatively small digital file sizes for e-books provide an added incentive for filesharers. A film can be up to 1.5GB whereas the typical e-book is no more than 3MB, making it much easier to download...

Until recently publishers thought that books were relatively safe because it was so labour intensive to scan each page to convert a book to a digital file. But they have discovered thousands of cases of piracy on hosting websites such as Rapidshare. Users can upload any file and then share it by posting the link on blogs, forums or in e-mails with their friends.

Ms Wise said that publishers needed to come up with better ways for readers to buy digital books. “We are at a delicate moment. We have a chance to get our distribution models right against a difficult backdrop of piracy. We have to encourage book lovers to make ethical choices. We would hope that people who love books would make supportive decisions about how they acquire them.”"

http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6925926.ece

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Publishers Getting The Wrong Message Over eBook Piracy; Tech Dirt, 11/24/09

Mike Masnick, Tech Dirt; Publishers Getting The Wrong Message Over eBook Piracy:

"Well, you just knew this was going to happen eventually. Suddenly publishers are starting to freak out over "ebook piracy," claiming (totally inaccurately) that they've lost $600 million to it. Of course, as some are noting the real problem isn't "piracy" but the industry's response to it".

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091124/0256097067.shtml