Tania Rabesandratana, Science; Will the world embrace Plan S, the radical proposal to mandate open access to science papers?
""In the OA movement, it seems to a lot of people that you have to
choose a road: green or gold or diamond," says Colleen Campbell,
director of the OA2020 initiative at the Max Planck Digital Library in
Munich, Germany, referring to various styles of OA. "Publishers are
sitting back laughing at us while we argue about different shades"
instead of focusing on a shared goal of complete, immediate OA. Because
of its bold, stringent requirements, she and others think Plan S can
galvanize advocates to align their efforts to shake up the publishing
system...
"The combined weight of Europe and China is probably enough to move
the system," says astrophysicist Luke Drury, of the Dublin Institute for
Advanced Studies and the lead author of a cautiously supportive
response to Plan S by All European Academies, a federation of European
academies of sciences and humanities.
If Plan S does succeed in bringing about a fairer publishing system,
he says, a transition to worldwide OA is sure to follow. "Somebody has
to take the lead, and I'm pleased that it looks like it's coming from
Europe.""
Issues and developments related to IP, AI, and OM, examined in the IP and tech ethics graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology", coming in Summer 2025, includes major chapters on IP, AI, OM, and other emerging technologies (IoT, drones, robots, autonomous vehicles, VR/AR). Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label Open Access (OA) movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Open Access (OA) movement. Show all posts
Monday, January 7, 2019
Friday, December 18, 2015
Open Access and Academic Freedom; Inside Higher Ed, 12/15/15
Rick Anderson, Inside Higher Ed; Open Access and Academic Freedom:
"As they have gained momentum over the past decade, the open access (OA) movement and its cousin, the Creative Commons licensing platform, have together done a tremendous amount of good in the world of scholarship and education, by making high-quality, peer-reviewed publications widely available both for reading and for reuse. But they have also raised some uncomfortable issues, most notably related to academic freedom, particularly when OA is made a requirement rather than an option and when the Creative Commons attribution license (CC BY) is treated as an essential component of OA. In recent years, major American and European funding bodies such as the National Institutes of Health, the Wellcome Trust, the Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and Research Councils UK have all instituted OA mandates of various types, requiring those whose research depends on their funding to make the resulting articles available on some kind of OA basis. A large number of institutions of higher education have adopted OA policies as well, though most of these (especially in the United States) only encourage their faculty to make their work openly accessible rather than requiring them to do so."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)