"The Supreme Court, grilling lawyers for TV-streaming service Aereo and the broadcast TV companies seeking to shut it down, focused Tuesday on issues of private versus public performance, universal uncertainty about risks to cloud computing, and the difference between true innovation versus technological cleverness to avoid paying for content. At stake in the copyright case is how people watch and pay for TV in the digital age, and how the companies that create content are compensated. The case could also call into question the legality of cloud-computing services unrelated to TV, something several justices brought up with both sides."
Issues and developments related to IP, AI, and OM, examined in the IP and tech ethics graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology", coming in Summer 2025, includes major chapters on IP, AI, OM, and other emerging technologies (IoT, drones, robots, autonomous vehicles, VR/AR). Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label differences between true innovation v. technological cleverness to avoid payment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label differences between true innovation v. technological cleverness to avoid payment. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
With Aereo, Supreme Court digs into copyright nuances; CNet, 4/22/14
Joan E. Solsman, CNet; With Aereo, Supreme Court digs into copyright nuances:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)