Issues and developments related to IP, AI, and OM, examined in the IP and tech ethics graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology", coming in Summer 2025, includes major chapters on IP, AI, OM, and other emerging technologies (IoT, drones, robots, autonomous vehicles, VR/AR). Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label differing copyright protection and compensation for songs recorded before 1972 and songs recorded after 1972. Show all posts
Showing posts with label differing copyright protection and compensation for songs recorded before 1972 and songs recorded after 1972. Show all posts
Monday, December 2, 2013
John Conyers: Music legends deserve R-E-S-P-E-C-T; USA Today, 12/1/13
John Conyers, USA Today; Music legends deserve R-E-S-P-E-C-T:
"A quirk of history protects songs recorded before 1972 under state law and songs recorded after Feb. 15, 1972 under federal law. Some digital radio services interpret that disparity to resist paying legacy artists who recorded music before 1972. The inexplicable result is that artists whose recordings were made before 1972 are not compensated by digital radio services while their counterparts whose recordings were made after that time are paid...
While state law offers a patchwork quilt of protection, the Library of Congress has recommended revisions that ensure consistency and uniformity by bringing all sound recordings under the federal copyright umbrella. While we would need to work with the Library's experts, users and rights holders to address the complex issues presented by such a transition, it is worth the effort to protect older artists, curtail litigation and eliminate the untenable withholding of royalties."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)