Issues and developments related to IP, AI, and OM, examined in the IP and tech ethics graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology", coming in Summer 2025, includes major chapters on IP, AI, OM, and other emerging technologies (IoT, drones, robots, autonomous vehicles, VR/AR). Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label pre-1923 Sherlock Holmes works no longer covered by US copyright law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pre-1923 Sherlock Holmes works no longer covered by US copyright law. Show all posts
Saturday, January 4, 2014
The copyright case: Sherlock Holmes at the center of legal debate; Associated Press via CBS News, 1/3/14
Associated Press via CBS News; The copyright case: Sherlock Holmes at the center of legal debate:
""Whatever decision they make will essentially determine the fate of many characters, not just Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, but very intricate characters such as James Bond. ... What happens as copyrights expire on Ian Fleming's original stories?" said Doyle estate attorney William Zieske.
The ruling could also weaken the value of the Sherlock franchise to the point that major publishers and movie producers could also decide to move ahead with projects without licensing deals, said Paul Supnik, a Beverly Hills, California, attorney specializing in copyright and entertainment law who was not connected with the case.
"At the very least it's going to affect the bargaining power as to what the estate can do in trying to sell it to the studio," Supnik said.
At the heart of the dispute is whether a character can be copyright protected over an entire series of works."
Monday, December 30, 2013
New Sherlock Holmes mystery: Where's my copyright?; Los Angeles Times, 12/30/13
Hector Tobar, Los Angeles Times; New Sherlock Holmes mystery: Where's my copyright? :
"The court case required U.S. District Judge Rubén Castillo to become something of a Sherlock Holmes expert, and in a 22-page ruling issued last week in Chicago, he began by summarizing the four novels and 56 short stories Conan Doyle wrote about the fictional detective: The character first appeared in 1887. The final 10 Holmes stories appeared in the U.S. in 1923...
Castillo's ruling allows anyone to use the Holmes character as long as they don’t use elements from the 1923 stories, which include details about Holmes’ and Dr. Watson’s past.
"Conan Doyle fails to offer a bright line rule or workable legal standard for determining when characters are sufficiently developed to warrant copyright protection through an entire series," the judge wrote."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)