Nate Anderson via Ars Technica; Thomas retrial begins Monday: what to expect:
Monday morning, the federal file-sharing trial of Jammie Thomas-Rasset begins, and Ars will be there with gavel-to-gavel coverage. Here's what you need to know to keep up:
"Last time around, the case took three days to hear; this time, the lawyers estimate that it will take five. If the retrial is anything like the first go-round, we should get a verdict quickly, though whether a jury will award the RIAA nearly $10,000 in damages per song again remains to be seen.
Whatever the verdict, [defense attorney Kiwi] Camara has already announced his intent to take on the recording industry's entire legal campaign. Along with Harvard Law professor Charles Nesson, Camara tells Ars that he plans to file a class-action lawsuit against the recording industry later this summer."
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/thomas-retrial-begins-monday-what-to-expect.ars
Issues and developments related to IP, AI, and OM, examined in the IP and tech ethics graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology", coming in Summer 2025, includes major chapters on IP, AI, OM, and other emerging technologies (IoT, drones, robots, autonomous vehicles, VR/AR). Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label retrial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label retrial. Show all posts
Monday, June 15, 2009
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Retrial Date Set in RIAA v. Thomas - Wired.com, 10/30/08
Via Wired.com: Retrial Date Set in RIAA v. Thomas:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/10/retrial-date-se.html
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/10/retrial-date-se.html
Labels:
copyright infringement,
Jammie Thomas,
peer to peer,
retrial,
RIAA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)