Rick Anderson, The Scholarly Kitchen; Do You Have Concerns about Plan S? Then You Must be an Irresponsible, Privileged, Conspiratorial Hypocrite
"Ultimately, though, what is most concerning about Plan S is not the
behavior of those hell-bent on defending it by any means necessary.
That’s just par for the course.
More important is the way in which researchers themselves — the people
whose work and whose freedom to choose will be directly affected by its
implementation — seem to have been excluded from the process of
formulating it. This shouldn’t be surprising, I guess, given the disdain
in which authors and researchers are apparently held by Plan S’s
creators. After all, as Science Europe’s Robert-Jan Smits puts it: “Why do we need Plan S? Because researchers are irresponsible.”
There you have it. The freedom to choose how to publish isn’t for
everyone; it’s only for those who are “responsible” — which is to say,
those who agree with Plan S."
Issues and developments related to IP, AI, and OM, examined in the IP and tech ethics graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology", coming in Summer 2025, includes major chapters on IP, AI, OM, and other emerging technologies (IoT, drones, robots, autonomous vehicles, VR/AR). Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Do You Have Concerns about Plan S? Then You Must be an Irresponsible, Privileged, Conspiratorial Hypocrite; The Scholarly Kitchen, November 26, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment