"Wednesday’s decision in American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo raises a big question about the right sources of interpretive authority in copyright cases. Justice Breyer’s majority opinion, finding that Aereo performed television programs publicly, was driven by legislative history and first principles, with analysis of the statutory text an afterthought. That approach turned a pure question of statutory interpretation into something more like common law adjudication. This is a departure from Justice Breyer’s past decisions on copyright, which have generally put the text first. If the new approach becomes the norm in Aereo’s wake, it could transform copyright into a more flexible but also far more unpredictable legal regime."
Issues and developments related to IP, AI, and OM, examined in the IP and tech ethics graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology", coming in Summer 2025, includes major chapters on IP, AI, OM, and other emerging technologies (IoT, drones, robots, autonomous vehicles, VR/AR). Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label legislative history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legislative history. Show all posts
Friday, June 27, 2014
Symposium: Aereo decision injects uncertainty into copyright; SCOTUS Blog, 6/27/14
Mitch Stoltz, SCOTUS Blog; Symposium: Aereo decision injects uncertainty into copyright:
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Were we smarter 100 years ago..?; James Boyle's Public Domain Blog, 7/17/09
James Boyle's Public Domain Blog; Were we smarter 100 years ago..?:
"I have been rereading the legislative history of the 1909 Copyright Act. I have come to the conclusion that 100 years ago we were smarter about copyright, about disruptive technologies, about intellectual property, monopolies and network effects than we are today. At least, the legislative hearings were much smarter. The hearings I am looking at took place in 1906 — thanks to the wonder of Google books you can read them yourself, if you are really nerdy."
http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/07/17/were-we-smarter-100-years-ago/
"I have been rereading the legislative history of the 1909 Copyright Act. I have come to the conclusion that 100 years ago we were smarter about copyright, about disruptive technologies, about intellectual property, monopolies and network effects than we are today. At least, the legislative hearings were much smarter. The hearings I am looking at took place in 1906 — thanks to the wonder of Google books you can read them yourself, if you are really nerdy."
http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/07/17/were-we-smarter-100-years-ago/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)