"“A contract with a public agency paid for with taxpayer money is not a trade secret,” he said. He noted that Pitbull’s lawyers argued that, but they were wrong. “Just because somebody claims it’s a trade secret, doesn’t mean it is a trade secret.”"
Issues and developments related to IP, AI, and OM, examined in the IP and tech ethics graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology", coming in Summer 2025, includes major chapters on IP, AI, OM, and other emerging technologies (IoT, drones, robots, autonomous vehicles, VR/AR). Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label public records. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public records. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 27, 2016
When are trade secrets not so secret? When Florida’s governor says so; Miami Herald, 12/16/16
Mary Ellen Klas, Miami Herald; When are trade secrets not so secret? When Florida’s governor says so:
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Oregon Tries Claiming Copyright Over Gov't Materials Again; TechDirt, 10/30/09
Mike Masnick, TechDirt; Oregon Tries Claiming Copyright Over Gov't Materials Again:
"You may recall last year that the state of Oregon tried to claim copyright in preventing others from republishing Oregon laws. Yes, that seems incredibly counterproductive, and eventually the state backed down. However, it looks like Oregon's Attorney General is now also claiming copyright on the Attorney General's Public Record and Public Meeting Manual. Yes. A government official claiming copyright over a document on the public record. Wonderful. Carl Malamud is trying to get the Attorney General to issue an opinion that such things will not be covered by copyright. But, again, can anyone provide any good reason why any government document should be covered by copyright?"
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091030/1537066744.shtml
"You may recall last year that the state of Oregon tried to claim copyright in preventing others from republishing Oregon laws. Yes, that seems incredibly counterproductive, and eventually the state backed down. However, it looks like Oregon's Attorney General is now also claiming copyright on the Attorney General's Public Record and Public Meeting Manual. Yes. A government official claiming copyright over a document on the public record. Wonderful. Carl Malamud is trying to get the Attorney General to issue an opinion that such things will not be covered by copyright. But, again, can anyone provide any good reason why any government document should be covered by copyright?"
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091030/1537066744.shtml
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)